What do you think?
Rate this book
306 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1996
'[…] For what we have here is a biological expression of human traits that is neither inherited from the immediate gene pool nor transmitted into it. It's exactly the kind of entity that would be hardest for a conventional scientist to accept. Biologists are under so much pressure to bring their findings into line with politics: right-wing politicians sit on them to find genes for everything, from poverty to terrorism, so they'll have an alibi for castrating the poor or nuking the Middle East. The left goes ballistic if they say anything at all about the biological expression of human traits: it's all consciousness and soul at that end of the spectrum.…I roll my eyes back at those who roll their eyes at this passage on the grounds of "science". The history of science is stranger than science fiction (I always say this about nonfiction vs. fiction because we expect nonfiction to be somehow normal and predictable). I do not just mean the philosophy of science (Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science); philosophy is predictably weird. I mean the social history behind science, including:
'But if you think about it, it figures that certain kinds of traits would have a biological correlate. But who said they have to be determined by biology? Maybe it even works the other way around – that they leave their imprint on biology. Who knows? […]'