What do you think?
Rate this book
152 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1921
Consider, for example, the case of Luther and Erasmus. There was Erasmus, a man of reason if ever there was one. People listened to him at first – a new virtuoso performing on that elegant and resourceful instrument, the intellect; they even admired and venerated him. But did he move them to behave as he wanted them to behave – reasonably, decently, or at least a little less porkishly than usual? He did not. And then Luther appears, violent, passionate, a madman insanely convinced about matters in which there can be no conviction. He shouted, and men rushed to follow him. Erasmus was no longer listened to; he was reviled for his reasonableness. Luther was serious, Luther was reality – like the Great War. Erasmus was only reason and decency; he lacked the power, being a sage, to move men to action. Europe followed Luther and embarked on a century and a half of war and bloody persecution. It’s a melancholy story.
"I hope you slept well," he said.
"Yes, isn't it lovely?" Jenny replied, giving two rapid little nods. "But we had such awful thunderstorms last week."
Parallel straight lines, Denis reflected, meet only at infinity. He might talk for ever of care-charmer sleep and she of meteorology till the end of time. Did on ever establish contact with anyone? We are all parallel straight lines. Jenny was only a little more parallel than most.
What about? About almost everything. Nature, art, science, poetry, the stars, spiritualism, the relations of the sexes, music, religion.Just by chance, all of these topics were those explored by Aldous Huxley during his lifetime. He was a descendant of T.H. Huxley ("Darwin's Bulldog") & Matthew Arnold, a graduate of Balliol College, Oxford and someone whose motto seemed to be Aún Aprendo, "I am still learning", with his life a continuous quest to explore all he encountered.
That morning he had preached, as he had often preached before, on the nature of God. He had tried to make them understand about God, what a fearful thing it was to fall into his hands. God, they thought of as something soft & merciful. They blinded themselves to facts; still more, they blinded themselves to the Bible.F. Scott Fitzgerald called Crome Yellow "too ironic to be called satire and too scornful to be called ironic." Huxley thought of his novel as "a little marionette performance & not a real milieu", even making jest of the character of Denis, who the author stated was himself in extreme youth, "someone probing into the palpitating entrails of his own soul."
There were times when he wanted to jump down from the pulpit & shake calm, well-bred, beautifully dressed Henry Wimbush into life--times when he would have liked to beat & kill his whole congregation.
He was in the mood to write something rather exquisite and gentle and quietist in tone; something a little droopy and at the same time - how should he put it? - a little infinite. He thought of Anne, of love hopeless and unattainable.As he remarks, "words have power". So then the reader may ask what the colour in the novel's title represent then? It is not obvious. However a scene where Dennis expounds the creation of the word 'carminative's meaning solely from its connotations may explain the title. Perhaps Huxley is trying to say that Dennis's superficial connotations are valid. That meaning derived from mere experiences can outlast the coldness of rationalism. The way the word looks, the way it sounds on the tongue, its individual parts, the colours it brings forth are not lessened in any way - but needs conviction for it to be regarded as anything but shallow. Fitzgerald remarks in his review that, "the book is yellow within and without". Just as a word may connote sunshine, saffron and the colour yellow - Crome's yellow is a smaller part of a larger word that strives to be found.