Rebecca's Reviews > The Poisonwood Bible
The Poisonwood Bible
by
by

I read "The Poisonwood Bible" for two reasons: Because I've always wanted to read a Barbara Kingsolver book and I am intrigued by secular takes on Christianity in modern-day writings.
I just finished it today. It is the story of a missionary family's trek to the Congo, told through the eyes of the four daughters and their mother. The father is a misguided preacher who is trying to escape past demons by force-feeding Christ to a culture that he has neither researched nor desires to understand (the name of the book is a reference to his misuse of the native language -- so instead of calling the Bible something holy, he's referring to it as a poisonous tree).
All in all, I am glad I read the book -- the discussion of the Congo's tumultuous history and the commentary on how the United States and various European nations have tried and failed to control something so wild and free was very interesting. It is a theme I saw repeatedly play out in this book -- when people/nations are unwilling to take the time to understand where others are coming from (be it individuals or people groups), the result is long-running anguish, regret and the destruction of lives and families. The writing can be very good -- the death of one of the daughters (which is disclosed early in the novel, although she is not identified) had me literally weeping over this book.
That all said. There were parts of the book that dragged for me -- and the whole catalyst for why these four girls and their mother were transplanted to Africa (a highly controlling husband/father) was never completely resolved to my satisfaction (he sort of disappears in to the jungle halfway through the book, never to return).
From a Christian standpoint, I was also disappointed in how missionaries were generally portrayed -- self-seeking, greedy and Bible-thumping morons who were either frothing at the mouth or couldn't get out of the country fast enough when the going got tough. There were also doctrinal errors (I spent several years as a Baptist and I never attended a church that believed baptism was a necessary ticket in to heaven -- quite the contrary, actually).
It would have been a fascinating foil to have a truly Christ-focused, God-seeking missionary family in these people's midsts ... while I appreciate how the only "good" missionary in this book didn't completely reject God, his buffet-style approach to what he accepted/discarded about the Bible was disturbing. Yet it was clearly held up as the preferred example for the rest of characters in the book.
I just finished it today. It is the story of a missionary family's trek to the Congo, told through the eyes of the four daughters and their mother. The father is a misguided preacher who is trying to escape past demons by force-feeding Christ to a culture that he has neither researched nor desires to understand (the name of the book is a reference to his misuse of the native language -- so instead of calling the Bible something holy, he's referring to it as a poisonous tree).
All in all, I am glad I read the book -- the discussion of the Congo's tumultuous history and the commentary on how the United States and various European nations have tried and failed to control something so wild and free was very interesting. It is a theme I saw repeatedly play out in this book -- when people/nations are unwilling to take the time to understand where others are coming from (be it individuals or people groups), the result is long-running anguish, regret and the destruction of lives and families. The writing can be very good -- the death of one of the daughters (which is disclosed early in the novel, although she is not identified) had me literally weeping over this book.
That all said. There were parts of the book that dragged for me -- and the whole catalyst for why these four girls and their mother were transplanted to Africa (a highly controlling husband/father) was never completely resolved to my satisfaction (he sort of disappears in to the jungle halfway through the book, never to return).
From a Christian standpoint, I was also disappointed in how missionaries were generally portrayed -- self-seeking, greedy and Bible-thumping morons who were either frothing at the mouth or couldn't get out of the country fast enough when the going got tough. There were also doctrinal errors (I spent several years as a Baptist and I never attended a church that believed baptism was a necessary ticket in to heaven -- quite the contrary, actually).
It would have been a fascinating foil to have a truly Christ-focused, God-seeking missionary family in these people's midsts ... while I appreciate how the only "good" missionary in this book didn't completely reject God, his buffet-style approach to what he accepted/discarded about the Bible was disturbing. Yet it was clearly held up as the preferred example for the rest of characters in the book.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Poisonwood Bible.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
May 29, 2008
– Shelved
May 29, 2008
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Richard
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Aug 02, 2008 01:41PM

reply
|
flag

Truly, I felt that Kingsolver just used the missionary story as a backdrop to tell the real story: that of the Congo's revolution.
Don't let your experience with this book put you off Kingsolver. This one is very different from her others. I think it's her most masterfully written, but that is because of the writing style and construction and not the plot. Try Bean Trees and the sequel (can't remember what it's called) -- they are more light, but still touch on social issues (Native Americans). I also liked the one about the moths and summer - dang, what was that called? Anyhow, check them out.




The very act of being a religious missionary (instead of being one who happens to be religious but is there solely to help with building/volunteering in hospitals and -nonreligious- schools, creating roads, bringing food/supplies etc, all WITHOUT pushing their religious views even subtly) it does require a bit of pushy fanaticism, on a psychological level. To go to a desperate people and bring them "religious change" actually REQUIRES one to believe theirs is the only legitimate belief. Otherwise, if it were about "widening horizons" & "offering choices" as many say, teach equally about ALL religions without the snide eyeroll many have when discussing (& usually incorrectly representing) other legitimate beliefs. In that sense, while Price is obviously an extreme example, definitely, he's not too far off on the spiritually arrogant Christian-supremacist level required in that field.
