Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Hypothetical consideration on Fox: case by case |
→Discussion 2 (Fox News): User:Atsme if you want to drop it, don't be WP:POINTy and hat people who oppose your viewpoints; besides all the points are discussing your argument which is relevant. |
||
Line 931:
:::^^^'''Note to closer: This user has 13 total edits.'''^^^ [[User:Atsme|<span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D"><sup>Atsme</sup></span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Atsme|<small>Talk</small>]]</sub> [[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]] 12:05, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
:::^^^'''Note to Atsme: I'm new, I know. That's why I chose not to vote and just left a comment instead.'''^^^ Please respond to my content rather than my edit count. We've already established that it's simple to rack that number up on talk pages. [[User:Wunderkiwi|Wunderkiwi]] ([[User talk:Wunderkiwi|talk]]) 01:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
::Good work on the [[And you are lynching Negroes]] argument. This RfC is about Fox News so all you could really do was to prove how other journalistic institutions got it wrong in some instances instead of proving the arguments wrong about how Fox News has diminished in their role as a source of reliable journalism. --<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',Geneva,sans-serif">[[User:QEDK|<span style="color:#732">qedk</span>]] ([[User talk:QEDK|<span style="color:#732">t</span>]] <span style="color:#000">愛</span> [[Special:Contributions/QEDK|<span style="color:#732">c</span>]])</span> 09:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
:::{{u|QEDK}}, please explain your comment and to whom you've directed it. [[User:Atsme|<span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D"><sup>Atsme</sup></span>]] <sub>[[User talk:Atsme|<small>Talk</small>]]</sub> [[Special:EmailUser/Atsme|📧]] 12:05, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Line 943 ⟶ 942:
:::: {{ping|Atsme}}, your umbrage is misplaced. Your comments are the first ones that implied racism, with a direct frontal accusation of a racist attack on you, one which did not happen.
:::: {{ping|QEDK}} is correct when they stated: "I never said that Atsme made racist comments, I said that they (implicitly) labeled me a racist, {{tq|racist comments like yours...}}, {{tq|...advise you to strike your racist comment...}},.." I don't see them making any kind of racist comment or racist accusation against you. They used a famous example of the ''tu quoque'' fallacy, which you have been using, and also mentioned "borderline whataboutism", which you also use in your arguments. That was their point, and your response immediately derailed and deflected from their point by <s>implying</s> directly accusing them of accusing you of racism. I don't see it. You need to calm down and retract that accusation. We need less heat here. -- [[User:Valjean|Valjean]] ([[User talk:Valjean|talk]]) 04:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
===Fox News: reliability in context===
| |||