Cecily's Reviews > Ubik
Ubik
by
by

A clever, original and often very funny sci-fi story. It is about psychic power battles, the nature of death, alternative reality and changing the past. Or not.
FUN, FUN, FUN - the clothes
It was published in 1969 and starts off in a sufficiently plausible but amusingly implausible 1992. In particular, the clothes take the flamboyance of the late '60s to extraordinary heights, for no obvious reason, other than fun. On the second page, we meet a man wearing "a tabby-fur blazer and pointed yellow shoes", which is fair enough, but only three pages later, an elderly man wears "a varicolored... suit, knit cummerbund and dip dyed cheesecloth cravat". After that, you're on the lookout for them, so here are more:
(view spoiler)
You have to wonder what might have prompted such wild flights of fancy. ;)
Another distinctive feature is that every chapter is prefaced with a short advert for Ubik, and each one demonstrates a different and amazing use for the wonder product. Each ends with a slightly worrying caveat about only being safe if used exactly as directed. Its enormous range of uses remind me of Flanders and Swann's Wompom. They sing it here, or read the lyrics here. I've also reviewed their songbook here.
Twice, characters say "so it goes", which I assumed was a nod to the famous catchphrase of Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five (see my review here), but both were published in the same year, so I guess it's just a coincidence. There is also mention of a dead parrot, but that can't be a nod to Monty Python as their famous sketch also dates from... 1969! Spooky, eh? Maybe PKD really could glimpse the future?!
Runciter's space transporter is called Pratfall II.
PLOT
Anyway, the crux of the story is the constant battle between people with psychic powers (such as precognition and telepathy) and "prudence" organisations that supply "inertials" who block such powers (often by using such powers themselves). Who are the goodies and who the baddies in such a setup: "A policeman guarding human privacy" or "trying to turn the clock back"?
Glen Runciter is the larger than life figure who heads one such prudence organisation, and Joe Chip is his right hand man. Pat is a new recruit who can change the past in such a way that people don't even know it. She and Joe may or may not have a thing for each other.
They and eleven of their best go to Luna for a rather mysterious job. After that, things turn strange: perceptions of reality shift, and time seems to slip back as well. Some objects age, some change, but not everyone's experience is the same. Are they going back in time, is the past receding, or are they in some other reality? The only shame is that from this point on, the clothes are less mad.
Joe is the principal character trying to work out what is going on, how to survive and so on. It's hard to explain further without spoilers.
THE FUTURE
Dick's 1992 is very commercialised: you have to pay for almost everything, though it's mostly coin-operated - even one's own front door! When someone couldn't find a coin and tried to dismantle his own lock, it threatened to sue him!
But on Luna, "All our medical care... is free. But the burden of proof that he is genuinely ill rests on the shoulders of the alleged patient." I hope no UK politicians think of that as a way to "save" the NHS whilst also saving money. (They'll love the "alleged".)
Dick doesn't foresee mobile internet etc (who did?), but the pape machine is rather like a printer connected to the internet.
HALF-LIFE
Runciter's wife, Ella is at a moratorium, in cold-pac half-life. She died, or near enough, but is in cold storage which provides a sort of life-extension. Most of the time she's unconscious, but she can occasionally be contacted; how many times, over how many years depends on lots of factors around the death and the freezing.
The moratorium and its inhabitants are significant plot elements, but are also used to explore the fuzzy boundary between life and death. Runciter consults with Ella, but how is this different from using a medium to consult the properly dead? Those in half-live can sometimes communicate with each other, "wandering through one another's mind gives those in half-life the only -", but they can't initiate contact with those outside. "'She exists... she merely can't contact you.' Runciter said 'A metaphysical difference which means nothing to me.'"
QUOTES
* "Herbert felt the weight of the hand, its persuading vigor". Runciter's hand (and vigor).
* "Nothing touched his mind... He chuckled, but it had an abstract quality... his voice always boomed, but inside he did not notice anyone, did not care; it was his body which smiled, nodded and shook hands." (Runciter again.)
* A messy apartment "radiated the specter of debris and clutter".
* "On his face, a feral, hateful expression formed, giving him the expression of a psychotic squirrel."
* "His voice had a squeaky, penetrating, castrato quality to it, an unpleasant noise that one might expect to hear... from a hive of metal bees."
FUN, FUN, FUN - the clothes
It was published in 1969 and starts off in a sufficiently plausible but amusingly implausible 1992. In particular, the clothes take the flamboyance of the late '60s to extraordinary heights, for no obvious reason, other than fun. On the second page, we meet a man wearing "a tabby-fur blazer and pointed yellow shoes", which is fair enough, but only three pages later, an elderly man wears "a varicolored... suit, knit cummerbund and dip dyed cheesecloth cravat". After that, you're on the lookout for them, so here are more:
(view spoiler)
You have to wonder what might have prompted such wild flights of fancy. ;)
Another distinctive feature is that every chapter is prefaced with a short advert for Ubik, and each one demonstrates a different and amazing use for the wonder product. Each ends with a slightly worrying caveat about only being safe if used exactly as directed. Its enormous range of uses remind me of Flanders and Swann's Wompom. They sing it here, or read the lyrics here. I've also reviewed their songbook here.
Twice, characters say "so it goes", which I assumed was a nod to the famous catchphrase of Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five (see my review here), but both were published in the same year, so I guess it's just a coincidence. There is also mention of a dead parrot, but that can't be a nod to Monty Python as their famous sketch also dates from... 1969! Spooky, eh? Maybe PKD really could glimpse the future?!
Runciter's space transporter is called Pratfall II.
PLOT
Anyway, the crux of the story is the constant battle between people with psychic powers (such as precognition and telepathy) and "prudence" organisations that supply "inertials" who block such powers (often by using such powers themselves). Who are the goodies and who the baddies in such a setup: "A policeman guarding human privacy" or "trying to turn the clock back"?
Glen Runciter is the larger than life figure who heads one such prudence organisation, and Joe Chip is his right hand man. Pat is a new recruit who can change the past in such a way that people don't even know it. She and Joe may or may not have a thing for each other.
They and eleven of their best go to Luna for a rather mysterious job. After that, things turn strange: perceptions of reality shift, and time seems to slip back as well. Some objects age, some change, but not everyone's experience is the same. Are they going back in time, is the past receding, or are they in some other reality? The only shame is that from this point on, the clothes are less mad.
Joe is the principal character trying to work out what is going on, how to survive and so on. It's hard to explain further without spoilers.
THE FUTURE
Dick's 1992 is very commercialised: you have to pay for almost everything, though it's mostly coin-operated - even one's own front door! When someone couldn't find a coin and tried to dismantle his own lock, it threatened to sue him!
But on Luna, "All our medical care... is free. But the burden of proof that he is genuinely ill rests on the shoulders of the alleged patient." I hope no UK politicians think of that as a way to "save" the NHS whilst also saving money. (They'll love the "alleged".)
Dick doesn't foresee mobile internet etc (who did?), but the pape machine is rather like a printer connected to the internet.
HALF-LIFE
Runciter's wife, Ella is at a moratorium, in cold-pac half-life. She died, or near enough, but is in cold storage which provides a sort of life-extension. Most of the time she's unconscious, but she can occasionally be contacted; how many times, over how many years depends on lots of factors around the death and the freezing.
The moratorium and its inhabitants are significant plot elements, but are also used to explore the fuzzy boundary between life and death. Runciter consults with Ella, but how is this different from using a medium to consult the properly dead? Those in half-live can sometimes communicate with each other, "wandering through one another's mind gives those in half-life the only -", but they can't initiate contact with those outside. "'She exists... she merely can't contact you.' Runciter said 'A metaphysical difference which means nothing to me.'"
QUOTES
* "Herbert felt the weight of the hand, its persuading vigor". Runciter's hand (and vigor).
* "Nothing touched his mind... He chuckled, but it had an abstract quality... his voice always boomed, but inside he did not notice anyone, did not care; it was his body which smiled, nodded and shook hands." (Runciter again.)
* A messy apartment "radiated the specter of debris and clutter".
* "On his face, a feral, hateful expression formed, giving him the expression of a psychotic squirrel."
* "His voice had a squeaky, penetrating, castrato quality to it, an unpleasant noise that one might expect to hear... from a hive of metal bees."
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Ubik.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
April 4, 2013
–
Started Reading
April 4, 2013
– Shelved
April 4, 2013
– Shelved as:
scifi-future-speculative-fict
April 12, 2013
–
Finished Reading
April 13, 2013
– Shelved as:
humour
May 19, 2013
– Shelved as:
usa-and-canada
Comments Showing 1-50 of 69 (69 new)
message 1:
by
Traveller
(new)
Apr 13, 2013 05:14PM

reply
|
flag

Kyle, it's quite a quick read, so easy to squeeze between meatier tomes.



Simon, if I have read PKD before, it was too long ago for me to notice any similarities in the female characters, but it'll be something to look out for in future.
However, I have seen the film of Minority Report, which I knew was PKD, so I did notice some similarities with that.

I don't think you can do it in the way you can on, for example, Facebook. However, if you want to post a link to it, that's OK. Well, within reason (not on a dodgy site or one that's making money for someone else!).





The "spoiler" isn't really a spoiler, as you discovered. I just wanted a way to hide detail that not everyone would be interested in, and I think that's the only tag to do it.

Mind you, I'm afraid it's the clothes that are the most memorable aspect for me.


Which is your second favourite?

No. I'm a die-hard fan of the Valis trilogy (or Quadrology, if you like.) I began with Valis and was blown the hell away, but be forewarned, it's almost completely unlike all the rest of his works. I was later surprised that he was a pretty damn comprehensible writer. :) Ugghhh.. I just remembered Do Androids Dream... that one was very good, too, as was Scanner Darkly... ah crap... too many good ones. I can't honestly place where Ubik would be in the mix. It did have it's faults, like characters I didn't *really* care about, but the ideas were so damn cool I didn't care. I sometimes pretend that my wife's hairspray is Ubik. (It only sometimes helps.)
:)


This is the only one of his I've read since student days (though I've seen film adaptations). Any suggestions for which to read next? (Though my pile of must-read-really-soon books is already towering.)


Quite right too. Sci-fi and humour are often looked down on (in cinema as much as literature), which is most unfair. There are good and bad in both.



(However, I often quote it, and I don't count myself a fan of his music.)


Hi, Emma. Three years after I read this, my main memory is of the general craziness, rather than specifics, but I assumed Ubik to be a pun on ubiq, as in ubiquitous. I don't think I saw it as God-like exactly (it's a thing, however useful, rather than any sort of being or consciousness), but I like the placebo angle.

Thanks, Brian - though I'm not sure clarity is the appropriate lens for this book!
;)

Thanks, Kevin. I hope the spoiler has given you ideas to jazz up your weekend wardrobe - or even your weekday one!

Thanks, Kevin. I hope the spoiler has given you ideas to jazz up your weekend wardrobe - or even your weekday one!"
Thank you for prompting me to read this, Cecily.
As with 1984, it's archaically futuristic (an oxymoron, I know). It doesn't seem to matter that the dates are long since past, both books still feel strangely as if they are ahead of us.
Ubik:
Ubiquitous commercialism, or omnipresent divine guidance? I'm still not sure what symbolism this is designed to convey!
Having now read the book I totally understand your wonderful review. Great job!