Cecily's Reviews > Ubik

Ubik by Philip K. Dick
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1199525
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: scifi-future-speculative-fict, humour, usa-and-canada

A clever, original and often very funny sci-fi story. It is about psychic power battles, the nature of death, alternative reality and changing the past. Or not.

FUN, FUN, FUN - the clothes
It was published in 1969 and starts off in a sufficiently plausible but amusingly implausible 1992. In particular, the clothes take the flamboyance of the late '60s to extraordinary heights, for no obvious reason, other than fun. On the second page, we meet a man wearing "a tabby-fur blazer and pointed yellow shoes", which is fair enough, but only three pages later, an elderly man wears "a varicolored... suit, knit cummerbund and dip dyed cheesecloth cravat". After that, you're on the lookout for them, so here are more:
(view spoiler)
You have to wonder what might have prompted such wild flights of fancy. ;)

Another distinctive feature is that every chapter is prefaced with a short advert for Ubik, and each one demonstrates a different and amazing use for the wonder product. Each ends with a slightly worrying caveat about only being safe if used exactly as directed. Its enormous range of uses remind me of Flanders and Swann's Wompom. They sing it here, or read the lyrics here. I've also reviewed their songbook here.

Twice, characters say "so it goes", which I assumed was a nod to the famous catchphrase of Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five (see my review here), but both were published in the same year, so I guess it's just a coincidence. There is also mention of a dead parrot, but that can't be a nod to Monty Python as their famous sketch also dates from... 1969! Spooky, eh? Maybe PKD really could glimpse the future?!

Runciter's space transporter is called Pratfall II.

PLOT
Anyway, the crux of the story is the constant battle between people with psychic powers (such as precognition and telepathy) and "prudence" organisations that supply "inertials" who block such powers (often by using such powers themselves). Who are the goodies and who the baddies in such a setup: "A policeman guarding human privacy" or "trying to turn the clock back"?

Glen Runciter is the larger than life figure who heads one such prudence organisation, and Joe Chip is his right hand man. Pat is a new recruit who can change the past in such a way that people don't even know it. She and Joe may or may not have a thing for each other.

They and eleven of their best go to Luna for a rather mysterious job. After that, things turn strange: perceptions of reality shift, and time seems to slip back as well. Some objects age, some change, but not everyone's experience is the same. Are they going back in time, is the past receding, or are they in some other reality? The only shame is that from this point on, the clothes are less mad.

Joe is the principal character trying to work out what is going on, how to survive and so on. It's hard to explain further without spoilers.

THE FUTURE
Dick's 1992 is very commercialised: you have to pay for almost everything, though it's mostly coin-operated - even one's own front door! When someone couldn't find a coin and tried to dismantle his own lock, it threatened to sue him!

But on Luna, "All our medical care... is free. But the burden of proof that he is genuinely ill rests on the shoulders of the alleged patient." I hope no UK politicians think of that as a way to "save" the NHS whilst also saving money. (They'll love the "alleged".)

Dick doesn't foresee mobile internet etc (who did?), but the pape machine is rather like a printer connected to the internet.

HALF-LIFE
Runciter's wife, Ella is at a moratorium, in cold-pac half-life. She died, or near enough, but is in cold storage which provides a sort of life-extension. Most of the time she's unconscious, but she can occasionally be contacted; how many times, over how many years depends on lots of factors around the death and the freezing.

The moratorium and its inhabitants are significant plot elements, but are also used to explore the fuzzy boundary between life and death. Runciter consults with Ella, but how is this different from using a medium to consult the properly dead? Those in half-live can sometimes communicate with each other, "wandering through one another's mind gives those in half-life the only -", but they can't initiate contact with those outside. "'She exists... she merely can't contact you.' Runciter said 'A metaphysical difference which means nothing to me.'"

QUOTES
* "Herbert felt the weight of the hand, its persuading vigor". Runciter's hand (and vigor).
* "Nothing touched his mind... He chuckled, but it had an abstract quality... his voice always boomed, but inside he did not notice anyone, did not care; it was his body which smiled, nodded and shook hands." (Runciter again.)
* A messy apartment "radiated the specter of debris and clutter".
* "On his face, a feral, hateful expression formed, giving him the expression of a psychotic squirrel."
* "His voice had a squeaky, penetrating, castrato quality to it, an unpleasant noise that one might expect to hear... from a hive of metal bees."
122 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Ubik.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 4, 2013 – Started Reading
April 4, 2013 – Shelved
April 4, 2013 – Shelved as: scifi-future-speculative-fict
April 12, 2013 – Finished Reading
April 13, 2013 – Shelved as: humour
May 19, 2013 – Shelved as: usa-and-canada

Comments Showing 1-50 of 69 (69 new)


message 1: by Traveller (new)

Traveller Ah, so you read it! Nice work! Do you think CM possibly 'borrowed' from it?


message 2: by Kyle (new)

Kyle Great review! Maybe I'll give this one a try the next time I'm in the mood for P.K.D..


message 3: by Cecily (last edited Apr 14, 2013 11:15AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Cecily Traveller, I can't see any connection, other than the name. Nevertheless, Mieville might still have chose to give a nod to PKD in this way. Now I just have to find which of the Mievellians' discussions mentioned this...

Kyle, it's quite a quick read, so easy to squeeze between meatier tomes.


message 4: by Ian (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ian "Marvin" Graye What a great review. Now where is my cummerbund?


Simon This is one of the least predictable books I've ever read from PKD, beyond one of the main female characters (Pat Conley I think she was called) once again being a flat-chested brunette who double-crosses the leading man.


Cams Nicely reviewed Cecily. You certainly did notice the clothing! My recent reading of this inspired me to watch Minority Report again, which I then discovered was based on a PKD short story of the same name. I should like to read that as well. The notion of precognition in science fiction has a lot of mileage.


Cecily Ian, I think a cummerbund alone will leave you very under-dressed. You need some other strange garb to accompany it.

Simon, if I have read PKD before, it was too long ago for me to notice any similarities in the female characters, but it'll be something to look out for in future.

However, I have seen the film of Minority Report, which I knew was PKD, so I did notice some similarities with that.


message 8: by Ian (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ian "Marvin" Graye Haha, I find a cummerbund and a tartan sock are perfectly adequate.


Matt Lehmann I want to share your review. Wonder if I can.


Cecily Matt wrote: "I want to share your review. Wonder if I can."

I don't think you can do it in the way you can on, for example, Facebook. However, if you want to post a link to it, that's OK. Well, within reason (not on a dodgy site or one that's making money for someone else!).


Chollie Your description of the clothing was double-hilarious. I'd forgotten many of those--except of course for the toga and the beret--it reminded me of an issue of Mad Magazine >)


Cecily Ah, Mad Magazine... <3


message 13: by Lit Bug (new)

Lit Bug Lovely review, Cecily! I read one of PKD's books and quite loved it.


Michael "The only shame is that from this point on, the clothes are less mad."

So true!


Cecily Thanks for your generosity, Leigh, though I'm sure there are plenty of other contenders for the first part of your comment.


message 16: by Caroline (new)

Caroline What a great review, and the book sounds absolutely fantastic, in the sense of being weird (and if you are right) wonderful....


message 17: by Dolors (last edited Oct 03, 2014 01:18PM) (new)

Dolors Couldn't resist the temptation of displaying that spoiler and I am so glad I did Cecily! Loved the extra quotes on the "flamboyant" fashion of the sixties...Great review.


Cecily Thanks, Caroline and Dolors.

The "spoiler" isn't really a spoiler, as you discovered. I just wanted a way to hide detail that not everyone would be interested in, and I think that's the only tag to do it.


message 19: by Lyn (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lyn Having to pay for everything is a detail I often think of when recalling this book


Cecily Yes, the front door especially.
Mind you, I'm afraid it's the clothes that are the most memorable aspect for me.


message 21: by John (new) - rated it 3 stars

John "...So it goes" could also be a reference to Ellison's "Repent Harlequin, said the TickTockMan", which was published in '65.


Cecily Thanks, John. I wasn't familiar with those.


Bradley Such a classic title, easily one of my top favorites for PKD. :)


Cecily I'm embarrassed to say it's the only PKD I've read since joining GR ~8 years ago. I was reminded of it just now because of Flanders and Swann, hence the update to my review.

Which is your second favourite?


Bradley Oh, this is merely my 4rd or 5th favorite. Definitely better than Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, but only just, and I like Ubik better than Man in the High Castle. (Which may be very odd for most PKD fans.)

No. I'm a die-hard fan of the Valis trilogy (or Quadrology, if you like.) I began with Valis and was blown the hell away, but be forewarned, it's almost completely unlike all the rest of his works. I was later surprised that he was a pretty damn comprehensible writer. :) Ugghhh.. I just remembered Do Androids Dream... that one was very good, too, as was Scanner Darkly... ah crap... too many good ones. I can't honestly place where Ubik would be in the mix. It did have it's faults, like characters I didn't *really* care about, but the ideas were so damn cool I didn't care. I sometimes pretend that my wife's hairspray is Ubik. (It only sometimes helps.)

:)


Cecily Thanks, Sabah. It's a hoot. I'm sure you'd enjoy it - especially the clothes!


message 27: by John (new)

John Winterson This is possibly the best introduction to PKD, showcasing his obsession with the nature of reality, but without the over-elaboration of plot that missed the point in some of his more famous novels.


Cecily I didn't have you down as a sci-fi or PKD fan.

This is the only one of his I've read since student days (though I've seen film adaptations). Any suggestions for which to read next? (Though my pile of must-read-really-soon books is already towering.)


message 29: by John (new)

John Winterson I have made a deliberate effort to read broadly, including SF. In any case, PKD cannot be categorised simply as SF. He really is an existentialist writer, who switches between SF and modernism to make his philosophical points about reality. I have read at least a dozen, possibly two dozen of his works, and a couple of biographies. He is one of the most under-rated literary talents of the 20th century - possibly because of the snobbery of the cultural Establishment about SF. 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?' has little in common with 'Blade Runner' but is clever in its own right. 'Flow My Tears The Policeman Said' merits comparison with Kafka and Orwell. 'A Scanner Darkly' is an all too credible account of drug addiction in general. I know what you mean about the tower of must-read-soon books!


Cecily John wrote: "I have made a deliberate effort to read broadly, including SF...."

Quite right too. Sci-fi and humour are often looked down on (in cinema as much as literature), which is most unfair. There are good and bad in both.


message 31: by John (new)

John Winterson If truth be told, most of both is indeed very dull and repetitive, but the best is truly illuminating - indeed, more serious than most 'serious' literature, which disappoints me more often than not.


Cecily It's to reduce the risk of disappointment that it's worth cultivating a circle of friends with similar - but not identical - taste. I've read so many things I'd never have considered before GR, and almost all of them have been wonderful.


Bradley So very true.


message 34: by John (new)

John Winterson So many books, so little time.


Cecily John wrote: "So many books, so little time."

Are you a Frank Zappa fan, John?


message 36: by John (new)

John Winterson Not really my cup of tea. Why do you ask?


message 37: by Cecily (last edited Feb 29, 2016 08:34AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Cecily I ask because the line you quote is widely credited to Mr Zappa!

(However, I often quote it, and I don't count myself a fan of his music.)


message 38: by John (new)

John Winterson I always thought it was a variation on Cecil Rhodes' attributed last words.


Cecily I didn't know that. Maybe Zappa was a fan of Rhodes!


message 40: by John (new)

John Winterson What a wonderfully surreal thought!


Cecily I think PKD would approve of surreal.


message 42: by John (new)

John Winterson Definitely!


message 43: by Emma (new) - rated it 5 stars

Emma More people seemed concerned about whether it was Joe or Runciter (or both) who died, but I wanted to know more about what Ubik itself was meant to represent. I get the God metaphor, but I think I finally get it, in a way that it makes sense to me. At the beginning of each chapter, you're told how to use the product and that it must be used correctlyout that. Ubik itself symbolises the god with no name, but it materialises itself as a product, with instructions. One could interpret the product itself as the bible. I read that Dick's wife said the Ubik product never really helped any of the characters in a physical sense, but that it was their faith in the product that made them heal and gave them life. Ubik is a placebo. It works as long as people have faith in it. This makes more sense to me than anything else. Who died and who didn't, doesn't matter.


Cecily Emma wrote: "More people seemed concerned about whether it was Joe or Runciter (or both) who died, but I wanted to know more about what Ubik itself was meant to represent. I get the God metaphor, but..."

Hi, Emma. Three years after I read this, my main memory is of the general craziness, rather than specifics, but I assumed Ubik to be a pun on ubiq, as in ubiquitous. I don't think I saw it as God-like exactly (it's a thing, however useful, rather than any sort of being or consciousness), but I like the placebo angle.


Brian Excellent and thorough review! You represent the book with perfect clarity.


Cecily Brian wrote: "Excellent and thorough review! You represent the book with perfect clarity."

Thanks, Brian - though I'm not sure clarity is the appropriate lens for this book!
;)


Kevin Ansbro Cummerbund-tastic, Cecily!


Cecily Kevin wrote: "Cummerbund-tastic, Cecily!"

Thanks, Kevin. I hope the spoiler has given you ideas to jazz up your weekend wardrobe - or even your weekday one!


Kevin Ansbro Cecily wrote: "Kevin wrote: "Cummerbund-tastic, Cecily!"

Thanks, Kevin. I hope the spoiler has given you ideas to jazz up your weekend wardrobe - or even your weekday one!"


Thank you for prompting me to read this, Cecily.
As with 1984, it's archaically futuristic (an oxymoron, I know). It doesn't seem to matter that the dates are long since past, both books still feel strangely as if they are ahead of us.
Ubik:
Ubiquitous commercialism, or omnipresent divine guidance? I'm still not sure what symbolism this is designed to convey!
Having now read the book I totally understand your wonderful review. Great job!


Cecily Nice oxymorons, Kevin - all of them! Thanks.


« previous 1
back to top