Madeline's Reviews > Gone with the Wind

Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
111921
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: the-list, historic-fiction

There's an episode of The Simpsons where Apu, the Indian owner of the Kwik-E-Mart, takes the American citizenship test. Apu, who throughout the episode has demonstrated a much stronger grasp of American history than any of the American-born characters, is at the oral exam stage of the test. His examiner, a bored white guy, is asking the questions, and the following exchange occurs:

"BORED WHITE GUY: Okay, last question - what was the cause of the Civil War?

APU: Actually, there were numerous causes. Aside from the obvious schism between abolitionists and anti-abolitionists, economic factors both domestic and international contributed -

BORED WHITE GUY: Just say slavery, okay?

APU: Slavery it is, sir!"

That series of quotes, I think, perfectly reflects my experience leading up to reading Gone With the Wind. Like most children who attended a public school above the Mason-Dixon line, my first exposure to the Civil War was basically, "The South wanted to keep slaves, and the North knew that was wrong, so we went to war to free the slaves. And then we won, and everything was happy." At the other end of the spectrum is Margaret Mitchell, who grew up listening to Confederate veterans tell stories about the war, but she didn't learn that the South had actually lost until she was ten years old. So obviously, her epic story about the Civil War was going to paint a very different picture than the one I had grown up thinking was correct.

Going into the book, I was steeling myself for lots of good old fashioned racism, and was surprised at what I found. Yes, the characters are racist. But they're all racist - black and white - and what interested me most was that class, rather than race, seemed to matter most. Scarlett and the other white characters hate lower-class whites a hell of a lot more than they hate blacks, and the blacks themselves draw very distinct class lines. Pork, the O'Hara's butler, looks down not only on poor whites but also on black characters of a lower social standing than himself. During the war, when only a few loyal slaves have remained at Tara, Scarlett has to farm the land herself and wants Pork to help plow. He refuses, stating angrily that plowing is field hand's work and he has never been a field hand. It is important to note that at this point they are starving, and farming is their only chance at food.

There's a lot of starving going on in this book, and a lot of fear and unhappiness. When I started the book, I got a little frustrated with how it seemed to be dragging - it takes over 100 pages for the O'Hara's to arrive at the Twelve Oaks barbecue - but as I kept reading, and the novel plunged deeper and deeper into war-torn despair, I realized why Mitchell had spent so much time introducing these characters and their happy, easy pre-war lives: once the war starts, there is not a single truly happy moment for the rest of the book. Once all the men ride away from the barbecue to volunteer to fight, all that comes next is 800 pages of starvation and fear and death and sadness. We need those detailed descriptions of the plantations, the clothes, the food, the luxury, so we can understand how much Scarlett and her friends have lost. Near the middle of the book, when Scarlett is going barefoot and stealing food to keep from starving, we understand her longing when she thinks back to her life before the war, because we remember reading this description of the Twelve Oaks barbecue:

"The long trestled picnic table, covered with the finest of the Wilkes' linen, always stood under the thickest shade, with the backless benches on either side; and chairs, hassocks and cushions from the house were scattered about the glade for those who did not fancy the benches. At a distance great enough to keep the smoke away from the guests were the long pits where the meat cooked and the huge iron wash-pots from which the succulent odors of barbecue sauce and Brunswick stew floated."

We get only this brief, wonderful glimpse of the luxurious life these people were living, and then the war starts and everything goes straight to hell, like an 1800's version of the The Road:

"The gray troops passed by empty mansions, deserted farms, lonely cabins with doors ajar. Here and there some lone woman remained with a few frightened slaves, and they came to the road to cheer the soldiers, to bring buckets of water for the thirsty men, to bind up the wounds and bury their dead in their own family burying ground. But for the most part the sunny valley was abandoned and desolate and the untended crops stood in parching fields."

The war destroyed not only a region, but an entire way of life for thousands of people, and you can see Margaret Mitchell's mourning for this lost era in every page.

"They looked the same but different. What was it? Was it only that they were five years older? No, it was something more than the passing of time. Something had gone out of them, out of their world. Five years ago, a feeling of security had wrapped them all around so gently they were not even aware of it. In its shelter they had flowered. Now it was gone and with it had gone the old thrill, the old sense of something delightful and exciting just around the corner, the old glamour of their way of living.
...An ageless dignity, a timeless gallantry still clung about them and would cling until they died but they would carry undying bitterness to their graves, a bitterness too deep for words. They were a soft-spoken, fierce, tired people who were defeated and would not know defeat, broken yet still standing determinedly erect."

This review is getting long-winded, and I've only started to explain everything about this book that makes it 5 stars. Aside from the history, the tone, the description, the general epic-ness of this epic, there are also the characters. And good lord. I could write another review entirely devoted to all the characters and why they are awesome despite being the last people you'd want to be in stuck in a room with, but I'll shorten it to a few characters.

Scarlett: Her transformation alone, from innocent flirt to flinty miser, is amazing in itself, but she's a powerful character no matter what stage she happens to be in. That being said, I hate hate hated her - I hated her shallowness, I hated her "unanalytical" mind, I hated her stupid crush on stupid useless Ashely, and she was so astoundingly unobservant throughout the book that it was all I could do not to scream at the pages. She was a great character, but that doesn't mean I have to like her.

Ashely: Christ, what a schmuck.

Mammy: The only character in the book I'd actually enjoy sitting down with. She had all the other character's best qualities, and none of their glaring faults. She had Melanie's grace, Ashely's kindness, Scarlett's strength, and Rhett's survival instincts. Mammy rocked my world.

Melanie: I kept going back and forth, switching between "she's the dumbest person ever" to "she's the best person in this book." I still can't really be sure where I stand on Melanie. I would want her on my side, but like Scarlett, I might want to slap her every now and then.

Rhett: Oh, Rhett. I so wanted to like him. And I did, when he was telling off the Confederates or Scarlett, when he was putting people in their place, and when he was being the only sensible character in the goddamn book. But then he would talk to Scarlett, and I would be drowned in wave after wave of smirking condescension. He was rude and selfish and had that attitude of "silly woman, your anger is so amusing" that is an instant dealbreaker for me. I suffer from PTTD (Post-Traumatic Twilight Disorder) so whenever I encounter a male character who exhibits even a little bit of condescension and protective instincts towards the womenfolk, I start twitching and picturing Robert Pattinson's ugly face simpering "I like to watch you sleep", and then I have to watch old episodes of Buffy the Vampire Slayer until the shakes stop. S ultimately, my verdict on Rhett was that he could go fuck himself and wipe that stupid smirk off his face.
293 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Gone with the Wind.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 26, 2010 – Started Reading
December 26, 2010 – Shelved
December 26, 2010 –
page 300
28.93% "I am liking this so much more than I expected to."
December 27, 2010 –
page 412
39.73% "Man, FUCK the Yankees."
December 29, 2010 –
page 618
59.59%
January 1, 2011 –
page 850
81.97% "Rhett and Scarlett are married. Shit's about to get real."
January 1, 2011 – Finished Reading
January 3, 2011 – Shelved as: the-list
January 1, 2012 – Shelved as: historic-fiction

Comments Showing 1-33 of 33 (33 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Dray I'll be fascinated to see what you think of this--I love both this book and your reviews!


message 2: by Manny (new)

Manny Excellent review! You almost make me want to read it.

And hey, that's my favourite Simpsons moment too. What are the odds?


Madeline Hey, it's a great episode. Also the title is "Much Apu About Nothing", so.


message 4: by [deleted user] (new)

Wow. I haven't read this book since fifth grade. I did do a book report on it but I suspect I missed much of what you mentioned above. You make me want to reread it.


Mariel There's nothing I love more than a good Simpsons reference in a gr review.


Sarah I disagree with you on Scarlett and Rhett ( both of whom are awesome) but I'm totally with you on Ashley and Melanie.

I loved this book when I read it a hundred and fifty years ago. I may reread it soon. It should also be noted that the movie is one of my top three.


Madeline I've been spending the past few months re-watching all the seasons of both Buffy and Angel on Netflix, and enjoying myself immensely.


message 8: by K (new) - rated it 5 stars

K Fabulous review of one of my all-time favorite books.


message 9: by Bonnie (new) - added it

Bonnie I've been following your reviews for a while and this might be my favorite one yet. That whole PTTD bit was the funniest thing I've read all day.


Graceann I loved this review - I loved it almost as much as I love the book, and that's saying something. Time for a re-read, methinks.


message 11: by Marjorie (new)

Marjorie Ingall This was one of the first grown-up books I ever read (I devoured Dr. No, Goldfinger, The Godfather, The Thorn Birds, Shogun and Gone with the Wind in a spew when I was 11-12, thus triggering some SERIOUSLY messed-up attitudes toward gender relations). Maybe I should re-read GWTW too...but I'm hesitant: Sexism and black dialect factor.

Small favors: Thank God Twilight was not around in my impressionable youth. That PTTD bit cracked me up too.


message 12: by Tiff (new)

Tiff Bravo on this review. Just, bravo.


Madeline *bows, blows kisses, collects flower bouquets.


Amina You reviews are absolutly fantastic. I'm only 150 pages into Gone With the Wind, meaning I shouldn't of read this review, which I didn't completley I skipped over some parts worried that it would give to much away, but I did read you reviews on the characters and your review on Rhett was awesome, definitly made me laugh


Madeline I tried not to give major spoilers in my review, but I realize that I did kind of describe most of the major stuff that happens. Sorry if I ruined anything for you!


Kaethe "and what interested me most was that class, rather than race, seemed to matter most"

"Seemed" is the key word. Southerners cling to class prejudice to give plausible deniability to racism. Of course, the most expensive country clubs are still whites-only.


message 17: by Jori (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jori This review is amazing! Thank you for sharing your thoughts.


Victoria I'm glad to find someone else who enjoyed this book as much as I did, and for the same reasons. Most people when they think of this book either have a preconceived notion that it is very romantic and very racist. The latter is true. And I'm not too ashamed to admit that I like Rhett Butler as a character and as a romantic figure. (What can I say? Overbearing, arrogant, strong male characters are occasionally attractive - but only in books.)

But there is so much MORE to this novel. The main reason I like it so much is because it answered a question that had been bothering me for a long while - the question of how anyone could think owning another human being was not only okay but natural. I really enjoyed reading this woman's point of view. It opened up the Civil War to me (a time period that I previously couldn't stand reading about) and went more into depth on how the war changed the United States.

Thanks for sharing your review! I always enjoy reading them.


message 19: by Nicole (new) - added it

Nicole Power I am going to read this book based on this review, but I doubt I could like it more than this review. PTTD is the most brilliant disorder I've ever heard :).


Emily Hanson I've seen the movie and now finished the book. I must say, I liked the book Scarlett a lot better than movie Scarlett. Movie Scarlett seemed to cry at the drop of a hat to get her own way. Yes, the character was young, but if I had been that overly dramatic as a teenager with my cancer-stricken mother in the house, I'd have heard about it, and not in a good way. Book Scarlett would have made an awesome CEO, had she been born in the proper time.


message 21: by Madeline (last edited Jul 12, 2015 10:02AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Madeline Agreed. Scarlett is a fantastic businesswoman (except for her employee relations) even in her own time.

One thing the book does very well is emphasize how Scarlett is able to use her culture's backward views of women to her advantage - after she takes control of her husband's lumber mill and is generally ruling the place with an iron fist, Mitchell's narration talks about how none of the men could do anything to stop her, because they had been trained to always be polite to women no matter what. There's a great line about how the men all went home and complained to their wives that if Scarlett was a man they'd punch her lights out.


message 22: by Dena (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dena Cooper Wow - just read this! What an amazing review! I really liked how you opened up with some personal perspective of your education and how people in different areas of the country learn a different take. I've always been baffled by this as I was born in Virginia but went to school in Michigan (long custody battle story). I've always connected more to my southern roots and family and I think an important factor to bring up regarding the post-war south is that southerners (I'm talking families that have lived in the same place since the war) are still poor as a direct result of the war’s devastation.

This was especially a problem in the 30's when Margaret Mitchell was writing her novel. My grandparents were still living this fearful, starving nightmare well into the 40’s. It’s always been interesting to me how quickly people are able to sum up the events of the Civil War - I’ve never been much for the abridged version which is why ‘Gone with the Wind’ has always been one of my favorite books. It brings forth a different point of view that you can’t really argue with.


Kamryn I adored this review and it made me laugh a few too many times because it is so painfully true.


Kamryn But I might have to disagree on one aspect--I don't think Rhett was as "oh, womenfolk are stupid" as assumed because he most definitely adored Melanie, respected Belle in his own strange way, and one was too trusting and naive and the other was a harlot. And he makes fun of men just as much as poor Scarlett. I think he just makes fun of people.


Laura I loved your review and agree with you. I do admire Scarlett, though, in spite of her horrible flaws, and Rhett is sexy. A jackass in many ways, but an attractive one.


Demaurhea shainl :ell I like ur book


message 27: by Macy (new) - added it

Macy You write great reviews. Just enough detail without spoiling anything.


message 28: by Cindy (last edited Jun 28, 2017 10:16PM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Cindy Newton Wonderful review--I absolutely loved it! While reading the book, I was struck by the similarity of the Southern societal mores and those of 18th and 19th century England. Both have the strict guidelines of sanctioned behavior for a "lady" and the rigid code of honor that they lived by--deference and protectiveness to women, refusal to back down from a challenge, and willingness to die defending their honor. When I read your observations about class in the novel, it was yet another similarity to that English upper-class society. They also prized birth and lineage over money.

I, too, suffer from PTTD, but I didn't find Rhett supercilious to Scarlett because she was a woman. In fact, he consistently ridicules the entire southern system of coddling women and treating them like brainless idiots. He knows Scarlett is smart and resourceful, and he treats her that way. He only gets insulting and condescending when she tries to use her femininity to get over on him. Rhett's treatment of people, male or female, depended solely on that person's level of hypocrisy and bullshit. He might have even been the only feminist in the book! But PTTD--that's good stuff!!

Thank you for such a beautiful and insightful review.


message 29: by Gurvinder (new) - added it

Gurvinder Singh what does this line means can anybody tell me Huccome po' w'ite trash buy any niggers? Dey ain' never owned mo'n fo' at de mostes'."


Anne-lise I loved your review...I just finished the book and you expressed my feelings very well...just loved the twilight plus Buffy references :)


message 31: by melanie Tang (new)

melanie Tang will you be my follower?


message 32: by Moz (new) - rated it 5 stars

Moz Copestake Yes, the dialogue with Apu sums up my preconceptions perfectly. What a great analogy.


Laura I'm reading the book right now. I am 72 years old. I'm on chapter 37 and my head is spinning. It's the chapter about the Yankee women not wanting a black nanny, about the roots of the KKK, about the Yankee bureau for the freed slaves, about how white southerners can't vote, but blacks can. It's like BLM is in Atlanta! History is truly written by the victors. What did o watch on TV growing up? Bonanza, Rawhide, etc. These westerns were set in the 1800s, probably during the Civil War, yet that is conveniently overlooked (except Johnny Yuma, the rebel....which had NORHING to do with the war).


back to top