Jessica J.'s Reviews > The Night Circus
The Night Circus
by
by

As a young girl, Celia Bowen is delivered to the father she never knew, a world famous magician whose secret is that his show is genuine magic - not illusions. He teaches Celia to manipulate the world in the same way so that she can compete in a high-stakes game against Marco, an orphan similarly trained by her father's nemesis. The arena for this game is an elaborate, surreal circus. Neither Celia nor Marco knows the extent of the game, nor their opponent, until they have fallen in love with each other.
I am going to blow the mind of everyone who gave this book five stars. My biggest problem with it was how badly Erin Morgenstern broken the cardinal rule of creative writing: show, don't tell.
I will 100% agree that Morgenstern did an incredible job describing the wonder and magic of the circus. Her elaborate descriptions of magical tents and off-beat performers initially drew me in, though I worried about how long-winded and verbose some of her descriptions could be. Morgenstern's problem is that the plot and character development takes places mostly through dialogue and not action. Most of the significant plot twists were revealed by one character telling another, which took most of the suspense out of the story. I had the same problem with the character development. There was practically no exposition to give insight into these characters, no sense that they acted with reason beyond the need to make the story do what Morgenstern wanted. They didn't feel real.
And the love story? Please. Dear Ms. Morgenstern: I do not believe two characters are in love simply because they say they are. They should act as though they are falling in love. Celia and Marco declare intense feelings for each other the first time they meet one another. The result is a juvenile, melodramatic, and inauthentic "romance" that I couldn't bring myself to care about. It's just like my friend's fourteen year old sister who declares her world-ending love for a different boy each week: "This one's different. It's real. I swear."
Similarly, it bothered me that the high-stakes battle unfolded in the form of Celia and Marco conjuring magical tents for each other...from afar. She did it from the center of the circus, where she was one of its main attractions, and he did it from London, where he worked as the assistant of one of the founders. I was expecting a dangerous, breathtaking game of one-upsmanship along the lines of the movie The Prestige. I know that the distance between Celia and Marco was necessitated by Morgenstern's love story, but it hardly made the game feel Life-and-Death. There was no suspense, so urgency, and really no sense of competition at all. Celia and Marco kept being told that they had to be careful and they had to up their game and that the battle would be coming to a head soon....but nothing ever seemed to come of these warnings. I never once worried that one of them was in danger.
I would give Morgenstern four stars for imagination and creativity, but her execution falls flat. If you want to read this solely for the descriptions of the circus and the magic, I'm sure you will enjoy this book a lot. If you're looking for a well-told story, look elsewhere.
I am going to blow the mind of everyone who gave this book five stars. My biggest problem with it was how badly Erin Morgenstern broken the cardinal rule of creative writing: show, don't tell.
I will 100% agree that Morgenstern did an incredible job describing the wonder and magic of the circus. Her elaborate descriptions of magical tents and off-beat performers initially drew me in, though I worried about how long-winded and verbose some of her descriptions could be. Morgenstern's problem is that the plot and character development takes places mostly through dialogue and not action. Most of the significant plot twists were revealed by one character telling another, which took most of the suspense out of the story. I had the same problem with the character development. There was practically no exposition to give insight into these characters, no sense that they acted with reason beyond the need to make the story do what Morgenstern wanted. They didn't feel real.
And the love story? Please. Dear Ms. Morgenstern: I do not believe two characters are in love simply because they say they are. They should act as though they are falling in love. Celia and Marco declare intense feelings for each other the first time they meet one another. The result is a juvenile, melodramatic, and inauthentic "romance" that I couldn't bring myself to care about. It's just like my friend's fourteen year old sister who declares her world-ending love for a different boy each week: "This one's different. It's real. I swear."
Similarly, it bothered me that the high-stakes battle unfolded in the form of Celia and Marco conjuring magical tents for each other...from afar. She did it from the center of the circus, where she was one of its main attractions, and he did it from London, where he worked as the assistant of one of the founders. I was expecting a dangerous, breathtaking game of one-upsmanship along the lines of the movie The Prestige. I know that the distance between Celia and Marco was necessitated by Morgenstern's love story, but it hardly made the game feel Life-and-Death. There was no suspense, so urgency, and really no sense of competition at all. Celia and Marco kept being told that they had to be careful and they had to up their game and that the battle would be coming to a head soon....but nothing ever seemed to come of these warnings. I never once worried that one of them was in danger.
I would give Morgenstern four stars for imagination and creativity, but her execution falls flat. If you want to read this solely for the descriptions of the circus and the magic, I'm sure you will enjoy this book a lot. If you're looking for a well-told story, look elsewhere.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Night Circus.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 13, 2011
– Shelved
September 15, 2011
–
Started Reading
September 27, 2011
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-49 of 49 (49 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Heather
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Sep 28, 2011 09:26PM

reply
|
flag


There are lots of different readers in the world, so I do appreciate your review! I agree that it's not your typical type of story-telling. Myself, I'm finding the book so intense that I can only read a few pages at a time, it's so complex and visually gorgeous. I have to stop and relax my senses or it's too much to take in.


Feel free to look through my "read" shelf - sort it by rating to see which ones I've liked. I try really hard to write about why I like them. I also LOVE giving recommendations - what kind of story are you looking for?







Conversely, I have never been able to get into Cormac McCarthy's style. I understand why others like him, but his writing is difficult for me to read.
You are completely right about being in the right mood. There were some books that I read right after a bad break-up that I loved, but when I went back to them I couldn't remember why. I guess they just spoke to where I was at the time and I think that's one of the most important things about books.

I guess in a sense books are marker points on a journey, aren't they, showing us the way we've come. I have to say though, I'm still a little embarrassed by how much I enjoyed "The Bronze Horseman." But I guess that's where I was back then... big sweeping sloppy romance between some girl and a tall guy with big muscles. Whereas now I'm a little more Alice Munro about things... Oh, and then how could I forget the McCarthy phase. Oh dear. I'm sure I developed a bit of a gait back then, chewed gum, and liked bandanas a little more than was healthy/trendy.
Bbbrrrr.
This review satisfies my hatred towards this book and $23.00 I spent.








That aside, all books are made to appease different audiences. Different types of people perceive things differently. I loved this book and think that the love in it was believable, and I like the way that it was written, but others don't.
Let's take another book for example. Looking for Alaska by John Green. Now, I love John Green, I am a Nerdfighter, and I absolutely adored The Fault in our Stars. After reading The Fault in our Stars, I read Looking For Alaska because of all the great things I'd heard about it. Everyone I know loves it, but I just...like it. Same with the other John Green books besides The Fault in our Stars. To me, the beginnings are great, but then the big event happens, and the last third of the book is the winding down. And some things just seem so random in his books. This also happens in the Fault in our Stars, but I think I was able to stay with it because I could connect in some way with what was going on, cancer and cancer killing people and so forth. Maybe I would keep interest in his other books if I could connect to them more. I think John Green is a marvellous writer, but his style just doesn't click with me. The same can be said about anyone else with another book, such as The Night Circus.
People just have different preferences in writing styles. Some styles are enjoyed by fewer people than others are, like Erin Morgenstern's style. And that is fine. I like it and others don't. Okay, great. Doesn't mean it's necessarily a bad book, it's just that some don't enjoy it much. Just ask the Twilight fandom.

But "Show, don't tell" is far and away the most common advice given to writers and I think that Erin Morgenstern was doing too much telling and not enough showing. I felt like she was telling me facts about the characters and not providing the character development necessary to show it. It didn't work for me and that's all I was trying to say here.






Thank you! My thoughts exactly! It was such a bore read for me, I ended up listening to the second half audio and even then it felt like torture, even though I was so excited when I started reading it.. It delivered none of the things it promised.. I'm just glad it's over.


In the end, was the circus even worth all this trouble they were going through? Proved to be an ordeal for some readers.
