Tim's Reviews > Dracula
Dracula
by
by

Over the years I've somewhat fallen out of reading classics, which is a damn shame as I typically enjoy the process of reading them even if I don't end up liking the book. In an effort to kick-start the process of reading them again on a more regular basis, I've decided to go with one I should have crossed off my list decades ago given my love of horror.
Dracula has been portrayed in so many different ways from all the different forms of media. He's been suave, sexy, violent, heroic, demonic… he's even been cute and cuddly.
(Picture of my actual copy of the book along with one of my daughter's plushies)
So, it was an interesting experience, going back and seeing Stoker's original intent. So what was he?
I think he could best be described as an ever present entity who is only seen for around 30 pages or so. He has such little "screen time" for a title character and yet he's felt in every scene. He's a predator, something lurking in the shadows the entire time and the reader is just watching as those around him slowly piece together what he's doing.
I can only imagine that when this originally came out in 1897 that it caused a stir. While slow paced, it's frequently disturbing even by today's standards, particularly some of the scenes early on in Dracula's castle and some later when our heroes are staking out (pun intended) a graveyard. (view spoiler)
I confess, I'm not personally a big fan of epistolary novels. I majored in English and have read quite a few, but it's not a style that usually appeals to me. As silly as this may sound, I find I like it most in where it incorporates modern technology, such as chat logs or texts as it creates a multi-media aspect through current means of communication… as such I actually love what Stoker did. He did 1890s equivalent, as there are diary entries, telegraphs, newspaper articles and even transcriptions of phonograph recordings. In fact, one of the most fascinating aspects of the novel to me was how prominent then current technology was, with descriptions of light-bulbs, recordings, blood transfusions and rapid transit through trains all aiding our heroes. This is in many ways a book about science conquering the dark and superstitions (though as Van Helsing is quick to note, sometimes superstitions have their reasoning and should be taken into account with science). It's a rather fascinating look at the topic.
My biggest surprise while reading (other than some of the frightening content), the thing that I will no doubt take away with some awe is that the book contains a cowboy. Yes, a cowboy. He's not a joke character, he actually serves a purpose… but there's a random cowboy in the vampire hunt. I recently while looking this up on the internet (to find out if anyone was a shocked by said cowboy as me and WHY DIDN'T THEY TELL ME) found this gem and will close my review with it:

5/5 stars
Dracula has been portrayed in so many different ways from all the different forms of media. He's been suave, sexy, violent, heroic, demonic… he's even been cute and cuddly.

(Picture of my actual copy of the book along with one of my daughter's plushies)
So, it was an interesting experience, going back and seeing Stoker's original intent. So what was he?
I think he could best be described as an ever present entity who is only seen for around 30 pages or so. He has such little "screen time" for a title character and yet he's felt in every scene. He's a predator, something lurking in the shadows the entire time and the reader is just watching as those around him slowly piece together what he's doing.
I can only imagine that when this originally came out in 1897 that it caused a stir. While slow paced, it's frequently disturbing even by today's standards, particularly some of the scenes early on in Dracula's castle and some later when our heroes are staking out (pun intended) a graveyard. (view spoiler)
I confess, I'm not personally a big fan of epistolary novels. I majored in English and have read quite a few, but it's not a style that usually appeals to me. As silly as this may sound, I find I like it most in where it incorporates modern technology, such as chat logs or texts as it creates a multi-media aspect through current means of communication… as such I actually love what Stoker did. He did 1890s equivalent, as there are diary entries, telegraphs, newspaper articles and even transcriptions of phonograph recordings. In fact, one of the most fascinating aspects of the novel to me was how prominent then current technology was, with descriptions of light-bulbs, recordings, blood transfusions and rapid transit through trains all aiding our heroes. This is in many ways a book about science conquering the dark and superstitions (though as Van Helsing is quick to note, sometimes superstitions have their reasoning and should be taken into account with science). It's a rather fascinating look at the topic.
My biggest surprise while reading (other than some of the frightening content), the thing that I will no doubt take away with some awe is that the book contains a cowboy. Yes, a cowboy. He's not a joke character, he actually serves a purpose… but there's a random cowboy in the vampire hunt. I recently while looking this up on the internet (to find out if anyone was a shocked by said cowboy as me and WHY DIDN'T THEY TELL ME) found this gem and will close my review with it:

5/5 stars
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Dracula.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 23, 2021
–
Started Reading
July 23, 2021
– Shelved
July 23, 2021
–
17.1%
"I’ve seen several film adaptations of Dracula in the past and I’m pleasantly surprised by many of the book’s differences thus far… but not going to lie, the most surprising thing is that the book has a cowboy. Not a joke character, just, you know, a random cowboy to make this vampire hunt complete."
page
66
July 27, 2021
–
52.85%
"Some highly effective scenes, as Van Helsing and Seward watch the graveyard."
page
204
August 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
19th-century
August 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
reviewed
August 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
horror
August 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
classic
August 1, 2021
–
Finished Reading
March 12, 2022
– Shelved as:
read-2021
Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mariah
(new)
Jul 28, 2021 12:53AM

reply
|
flag

I’m enjoying it, but it’s slow going. I’m not an overly big fan of epistolary novels, so I find that I’m less inclined to read at great length. That said, the story is wonderful, some scenes surprisingly “scary” especially given when it was written (I’ve read plenty of Victorian ghost stories and horror novels, and I find some scenes in this more shocking than most from the period).

Great review, btw.

Nothing. This book has everything I could ask for and more.
Glad you enjoyed it. :)




I was genuinely surprised by some of the content. Very eerie. It's earned it's classic status with good reason in my opinion.

"
...
...
...
I would totally watch that movie. :D


You're right! It's interesting that video games were the ones that latched on to that detail while most of the actual adaptations completely ignored it.


Thank you Julia! Glad you enjoyed the review. I haven't read Dracul yet. I remember Dacre Stoker tried a different attempt at before with a direct sequel to Dracula (which I recall hearing was pretty bad) so I haven't given Dracul a shot out of fear of that... that said, apparently this one is much better. :)

I think Coppola's movie sits alongside Todd Browning's 1931 adaptation for my favorite take on Dracula. The Coppola one while taking many liberties probably is the most visually interesting though and Oldman's performance is wonderful (as is Hopkins playing Van Helsing)