Mark Porton's Reviews > Year of Wonders

Year of Wonders by Geraldine Brooks
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
18643650
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: historical-fiction

I am a bit ambivalent about this story. We are plummeted into what must have been one of the darkest periods of human history. Not just because of the plague, terrible enough as it was, but because of the suffocating amount of superstition and ignorance. Let me just clarify, ignorance in the sense of not knowing about a certain thing or unusual event is fine, but creating fairy tales to explain such phenomena drives me nuts – so specifically, let’s say, witchcraft (burn her!!!!) and various flavours of dogmatic religious beliefs and practices drove me bananas. Still does.

Anna Frith is the main character here and she is a widower living in Derbyshire in the 1600s. Her small town is hit by the bubonic plague. This terrible disease with a mortality rate around 40-60% or closer to 100% if left untreated. This disease provides for an excruciating death, as the bacteria Yersinia pestis explodes into the bloodstream causing fatal septicaemias (there are other forms too – such as pneumonias and more). One notable feature is the appearance of grotesque bulbous protrusions on one’s body, often erupting and causing all sorts of unsightly and painful deaths.



People are dropping like flies. The descriptions provided by the author are graphic and grim. I found this part of the story interesting, as it provided a taste of what life might have been like. There are various characters we can hate (like Anna’s dad) and characters we can love, like our narrator - Anna.

However, towards the end of the story a few things happened that rocked my bubonic world. I did not expect some of these occurrences, in fact, I thought they were a little unlikely, unusually so. It was all a bit unsettling.

I was also a little perturbed by the first-person narrative of Anna. She often used words like “shit,” which did not work for me, as (even stated in the book) people could be put in the stocks and have rotten carrots thrown at them for swearing. Her narrative was a bit too modern, it lacked authenticity.

This was a bit disappointing as this is a worthwhile topic. Particularly considering our recent experiences with our own pandemic. But it did make me think – if COVID-19 had the same mortality rate as the plague or say the Ebola virus, we all would have been having entirely different conversations – those of us who were left.

2 Stars
75 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Year of Wonders.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

December 4, 2023 – Started Reading
December 4, 2023 – Shelved
December 6, 2023 –
page 130
40.63% "Not since the birth of my 3 girls have I been so invested in a live birth....I was rooting for mother, baby and midwife in this tricky birth. My word, I'm exhausted!!!!!"
December 9, 2023 –
page 210
65.63% "My word this is grim. Well written though. But, oh so grim."
December 9, 2023 – Finished Reading
December 10, 2023 – Shelved as: historical-fiction

Comments Showing 1-48 of 48 (48 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lisa (new)

Lisa Is this your first novel by her? I'm curious as to what you think of her fiction writing.


Mark  Porton This is my first one Lisa and my first impression is "immersive". How about you?


message 3: by Lisa (new)

Lisa Mark wrote: "This is my first one Lisa and my first impression is "immersive". How about you?"

I like and don't love her fiction. So many of my friends love her books though, so I am waiting to see how you land with her.


Mark  Porton Lisa wrote: "Mark wrote: "This is my first one Lisa and my first impression is "immersive". How about you?"

I like and don't love her fiction. So many of my friends love her books though, so I am waiting to se..."


So far so good Lisa - I'm finding it really immersive, I need to read it slowly and saviour it. It seems to be written with so much care for the subjects. The topic here, the plague is horrifying and she doesn't hold back. The time of mis-1600s England is also a dark time, lots of superstition, lots of strict religious beliefs. So, I love it :))


Adina (notifications back, log out, clear cache) I rated it 2* for the whole 2nd part.


Judith E Yes, the ending was bizarro.


message 7: by Jennifer (new)

Jennifer Welsh I'm looking forward to seeing where you land here, Mark...


message 8: by Kim (new) - rated it 3 stars

Kim The bizarre ending threw out my suspension of disbelief. My favourite of her's is The People of the Book.


Lorna Oh Mark, this is a controversial author at times but I love her books. I think Geraldine Brooks is a brilliant writer. And I read this book in the middle of the pandemic that added a bit of reality to the book. She may not be the author for you, but after all, she is from your part of the world. Take care my friend!


message 10: by Lisa (new)

Lisa Now that you have read one of her novels I'll give you my two cents. I find her nonfiction writing riveting, informative and well done. She loses me with her characters and parts of her story lines. After multiple tries with her novels, I have decided that I am parting ways with her fiction. If she writes a nonfiction book or returns to journalism, I will be there for that.


message 11: by Candi (new)

Candi I loved this book years ago when I read it, but I wonder if it would work for me now. My taste has changed so much. You've written a terrific review and I totally get why you were less than enthusiastic about it, Markus!


Mark  Porton Adina wrote: "I rated it 2* for the whole 2nd part."

I reckon we're eye-to-eye on this one Adina, I agreed with the comments you made in your write-up!


Mark  Porton Judith wrote: "Yes, the ending was bizarro."

"Bizarro" - hahaha - love it, it was indeed!!


Mark  Porton Jennifer wrote: "I'm looking forward to seeing where you land here, Mark..."

I dont think my landing gear was engaged Jennifer, made the landing tricky, but I'll recover!!


Mark  Porton Kim wrote: "The bizarre ending threw out my suspension of disbelief. My favourite of her's is The People of the Book."

Yes, I agree Kim - the characters were largely believable and 'real', I just dont know what happened with the ending!!!


message 16: by Terrie (new)

Terrie  Robinson Wonderful review, Mark, and I certainly understand your reasons for rating! I plan to read a couple of this author books next year but this wasn’t one of them. Hope your current read is knocking your socks off😊


Mark  Porton Lisa wrote: "Now that you have read one of her novels I'll give you my two cents. I find her nonfiction writing riveting, informative and well done. She loses me with her characters and parts of her story lines..."

Thanks for the heads up on this author's non-fiction Lisa, I have just checked her titles and they do look interesting. I will, however, try another fiction at some stage. What would you recommend, or be least likely to not-recommend? :)


Mark  Porton Candi wrote: "I loved this book years ago when I read it, but I wonder if it would work for me now. My taste has changed so much. You've written a terrific review and I totally get why you were less than enthusi..."

Awww thanks heaps Canders, it's a shame I can't read what you thought about it - maybe time for a re-read???? Have you read much of her others work?


Mark  Porton Terrie wrote: "Wonderful review, Mark, and I certainly understand your reasons for rating! I plan to read a couple of this author books next year but this wasn’t one of them. Hope your current read is knocking yo..."

Oh my next read has me hooked already (Big Swiss), thanks so much again Terrie - shame though, as I felt I should've liked this one - if that makes sense. Thanks again :)


message 20: by Angela (new)

Angela Well reasoned review Mark. My only Geraldine Books read was Horse which I didn't mind, although the content was totally different of course. I had a laugh at your comment on the use of the "s" word. I imagine 1666 would have been a tad early for it, but you never know I suppose. Might have to pass on this one. Hope your current read is a winner.


message 21: by Ian (new)

Ian Excellent review Mark!

I liked that you highlighted the use of anachronistic dialogue. That's a pet hate of mine!


message 22: by Laysee (new)

Laysee A good critique, Mark. I understood why this book did not earn more stars. A fairy tale to explain a little understood phenomenon will drive me bananas too.


message 23: by Vanessa (last edited Dec 11, 2023 12:46PM) (new)

Vanessa Thanks for your review Mark and sorry that this one did not work for you. I loved People of the Book but had not read any of her other titles. Anna's use of that word would have irked me too.


Mark  Porton Angela wrote: "Well reasoned review Mark. My only Geraldine Books read was Horse which I didn't mind, although the content was totally different of course. I had a laugh at your comment on the use..."

My current read is a beauty Angela and thanks so much for your comments again - I have Horse on my TBR and do intend to read it, this author is highly respected maybe it was a case here of wrong book for me. Thanks again :))


Mark  Porton Ian wrote: "Excellent review Mark!

I liked that you highlighted the use of anachronistic dialogue. That's a pet hate of mine!"


Thanks for giving me as name of something I don't like Ian! "Anachronistic dialogue" - yes. But, it just seemed so obvious to me, maybe the author meant to do it. Who knows, thanks again mate :)


Mark  Porton Laysee wrote: "A good critique, Mark. I understood why this book did not earn more stars. A fairy tale to explain a little understood phenomenon will drive me bananas too."

Hahahaha - nothing worse than being driven to bananas hey Laysee, thanks so much :))


Mark  Porton Vanessa (Newville PA) wrote: "Thanks for your review Mark and sorry that this one did not work for you. I loved People of the Book but had not read any of her other titles. Anna's use of that word have irked me too."

Yes, it happened a few times Vanessa - thanks so much for your comments, I will read more by this author though as the first three quarters, or more, was pretty good :))


message 28: by Diane (new)

Diane Barnes I'm with Candi, I read it years ago and loved it, but was very happy to be living in modern times. Even researching the lifestyles of that period would give me the heebie-jeebies!


Antoinette Terrific summation of this book, Mark. I can’t say I loved it when I read it. I have read a few of her books and my favourite was her non fiction- Nine Parts of Desire. The rest were just ok- the 3 star types. An author I have stopped picking up for that reason.


message 30: by Canadian Jen (new) - added it

Canadian Jen I do have this on my list to read but now I'm hesitating. Shit. I didn't want to have to but thanks for the heads up. I'm not sure it will sit well with me if it sounds modern. Will keep it on for now as I do own it. Fair review, Mark


message 31: by Yun (new)

Yun Great and fair review, Mark! I understand your comment about the narrative not quite matching the times. I've come across a few books like that and it always throws me a bit. Sorry this one ended up falling short.


message 32: by Mark (last edited Dec 12, 2023 09:00AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Mark  Porton Diane wrote: "I'm with Candi, I read it years ago and loved it, but was very happy to be living in modern times. Even researching the lifestyles of that period would give me the heebie-jeebies!"

Yes, it's certainly depressing Diane, almost as depressing as the dark ages - imagine that??


Mark  Porton Antoinette wrote: "Terrific summation of this book, Mark. I can’t say I loved it when I read it. I have read a few of her books and my favourite was her non fiction- Nine Parts of Desire. The rest were just ok- the 3..."

Thanks heaps Antoinette - I might try Horse, but this book hasn't really given me a lot of confidence!!


Mark  Porton Jen CANADA wrote: "I do have this on my list to read but now I'm hesitating. Shit. I didn't want to have to but thanks for the heads up. I'm not sure it will sit well with me if it sounds modern. Will keep it on for ..."

"Shit" indeed Jen Jen 😂😂.........what to do? Again, the reviews are mixed - some love it, you might be in 'that lot' - thanks again :))


Mark  Porton Yun wrote: "Great and fair review, Mark! I understand your comment about the narrative not quite matching the times. I've come across a few books like that and it always throws me a bit. Sorry this one ended u..."

Yes indeed, I wouldn't recommend this one Yun, but thanks for your kind comments once again!!


message 36: by Jennifer (new)

Jennifer Welsh The ignorance behind political fairy tales is hitting too close to our toxic present for me to read this, Mark. Although it is interesting that it occurred twice in history during a plague—I hadn't connected the timing of the two, and now wonder if that's a pattern. Also, anachronistic language drives me nuts. I read one Brooks and haven't been convinced to read her again. It doesn't sound like the trouble with your gear was your fault. More like the wind was taken from your sails? Thanks for your review!


message 37: by Candi (new)

Candi "Awww thanks heaps Canders, it's a shame I can't read what you thought about it - maybe time for a re-read???? Have you read much of her others work?"

I've read a couple of her other books, Markus. People of the Book and March. While I didn't love them, I did enjoy them quite a bit!


message 38: by Lori (new)

Lori  Keeton I’ve only read 3 of her books and she’s not my favorite at all. Sorry this was disappointing and unsettling. Never a great combo!


Mark  Porton Jennifer wrote: "The ignorance behind political fairy tales is hitting too close to our toxic present for me to read this, Mark. Although it is interesting that it occurred twice in history during a plague—I hadn't..."

Thanks again Jennifer - yes the language thing was a bit annoying, not sure if I was being picky or not. Re the ".......occured twice in history" comment you made, sorry I'm a bit dim lately - what were you referring to? Thanks again :))


Mark  Porton Lori wrote: "I’ve only read 3 of her books and she’s not my favorite at all. Sorry this was disappointing and unsettling. Never a great combo!"

Indeed Lori, thanks for dropping by!!!


message 41: by Terence M - [Quot libros, quam breve tempus!] (last edited Dec 14, 2023 05:51AM) (new)

Terence M - [Quot libros, quam breve tempus!] Pretty good coverage of a book you didn't like, mate! I guess you know that Geraldine Brooks is an Sydney-born author, now a USA citizen. I bought her best-seller "Horse", about a famous US racehorse named "Lexington", for my daughter, but I don't think she has listened to it yet.

I quite enjoyed "Big Swiss", btw, and rated it @ 3.5 rounded to 3.0 Stars. It's a bit of, err, different reading for an older bloke 😉.


Mark  Porton Terence M - [Quot libros, quam breve tempus!] wrote: "Pretty good coverage of a book you didn't like, mate! I guess you know that Geraldine Brooks is an Sydney-born author, now a USA citizen. I bought her best-seller "Horse", about a famous US racehor..."

Hey Tezza, sorry for the delay mate. Yeah I think it deserved a bit of thought as it's so well written in many ways. I can understand why some people do like it. Lexington - I've heard of that one, wonder if he/she would've beaten our Phar Lap mate? Bigg Swiss was so good and you're right a bit different - I'm sure you could handle the content Terry!!! 😂🤗


message 43: by Jennifer (new)

Jennifer Welsh Mark wrote: "Jennifer wrote: "The ignorance behind political fairy tales is hitting too close to our toxic present for me to read this, Mark. Although it is interesting that it occurred twice in history during ..."

American politics, Mark. Sorry to be egocentric about it ;)


message 44: by Caroline (last edited Dec 17, 2023 06:41PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Caroline "But it did make me think – if COVID-19 had the same mortality rate as the plague or say the Ebola virus, we all would have been having entirely different conversations – those of us who were left."

AGREE. Also, during the pandemic, I often thought that if COVID-19 were frighteningly "visual," people wouldn't be cavalier (to put it nicely) about prevention, and they definitely wouldn't doubt the seriousness of the illness.

Nice review. I remember this book taking a weird, surprising turn at the end, and I think that hurt the story. :[ I forgot about the protagonist's use of "shit." How strange that Brooks (or her editor[s]) didn't notice that anachronism.


Mark  Porton Caroline wrote: ""But it did make me think – if COVID-19 had the same mortality rate as the plague or say the Ebola virus, we all would have been having entirely different conversations – those of us who were left...."

Caroline, I was still working (in the lab) when COVID hit and it frustrated me a bit when people were trivialising the disease and mocking the measures being put in place to limit its spread. Our hospital (600 beds), here in Cairns, was full, emergency department was flat out and full, and people were dying. We were all working around the clock, not only to service COVID requests, but to keep the other (usual) stuff going......it was a nightmare. Uuuurggghh. We certainly live in a post-truth world.


Caroline Mark wrote: "Caroline, I was still working (in the lab) when COVID hit and it frustrated me a bit when people were trivialising the disease and mocking the measures being put in place to limit its spread. Our hospital (600 beds), here in Cairns, was full, emergency department was flat out and full, and people were dying. We were all working around the clock, not only to service COVID requests, but to keep the other (usual) stuff going......it was a nightmare. Uuuurggghh. We certainly live in a post-truth world."

I'm so sorry, Mark. That sounds like utter hell. Thanks for all you did!

Apparently, for some people to believe, the sick need to drop dead in the street in front of them before they'll take basic precautions. How stupid can you get? :[ :[


Mark  Porton Caroline wrote: "Mark wrote: "Caroline, I was still working (in the lab) when COVID hit and it frustrated me a bit when people were trivialising the disease and mocking the measures being put in place to limit its ..."

I agree Caroline, it's 'peak-stupid'. I watched an interview yesterday, Neil Tyson Degrasse and Charles Barkley (of all people), talking about alien life. Barkley said "I dont believe in alien life because I haven't seen one". Degreasse almost fell of his chair. So you're right, do these people have to see someone die of COVID before they think it's dangerous?


Caroline Mark wrote: "I agree Caroline, it's 'peak-stupid'. I watched an interview yesterday, Neil Tyson Degrasse and Charles Barkley (of all people), talking about alien life. Barkley said "I dont believe in alien life because I haven't seen one". Degreasse almost fell of his chair."

I can only imagine how frustrated Degrasse must have felt--yet from what I've seen of him here and there, he stays calm well.


back to top