Peter Boyle's Reviews > Lost Children Archive

Lost Children Archive by Valeria Luiselli
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1903072
's review

liked it
bookshelves: booker-nominee

I can see why Lost Children Archive has been nominated for awards. It addresses one of the most pressing issues of modern times. It's inventive, it takes risks with form. Not all of them succeed, in my eyes, but you have to give the author respect for trying something different.

The story centres on an American road trip. A woman and her husband, both documentarians, are travelling from New York to Arizona with their children from past relationships - a ten-year-old boy (his) and a five-year-old girl (hers). Once they get there, the husband is planning to start a new project on the Apache culture. The wife has been helping a Mexican woman whose daughters have been detained after crossing the border, and is hoping to find out more about their situation. On the journey, the four of them listen to news reports about the immigration crisis along with audiobooks like Lord of the Flies. The father teaches the children all he knows about Native American history. We also get the sense that the marriage is in trouble. And then about two-thirds of the way through, the family have a new crisis thrust upon them.

This late plot twist gives much needed impetus to a story that had been meandering, and it left me wishing that had happened sooner. For all its topicality and sincerity, I was beginning to find the earlier sections a bit aimless and repetitive. But it flickers into life whenever the wife talks about the gradual disintegration of her marriage, or when she explains the immigration problem as best she can to her inquisitive children:
"A refugee is someone who has already arrived somewhere, in a foreign land, but must wait for an indefinite time before actually, fully having arrived. Refugees wait in detention centers, shelters, or camps; in federal custody and under the gaze of armed officials. They wait in long lines for lunch, for a bed to sleep in, wait with their hands raised to ask if they can use the bathroom. They wait to be let out, wait for a telephone call, for someone to claim or pick them up. And then there are refugees who are lucky enough to be finally reunited with their families, living in a new home. But even those still wait. They wait for the court’s notice to appear, for a court ruling, for either deportation or asylum, wait to know where they will end up living and under what conditions. They wait for a school to admit them, for a job opening, for a doctor to see them. They wait for visas, documents, permission. They wait for a cue, for instructions, and then wait some more. They wait for their dignity to be restored."

Though the kids often sounded too advanced for their age, if you ask me. The narrative also includes part of a book that the mother has been reading about lost children, which alludes to works by Conrad, Eliot & Pound, among others. I'm not sure this device was really necessary - it all felt a bit pretentious to me. And at the end of the main text, Luiselli includes a "Works Cited" section, to tell you all of the classics she has made reference to in these "Elegies", just in case you missed them.

There's a lot going on in Lost Children Archive. I do think there is the kernel of a great novel in there somewhere but it is buried beneath some showy literary affectations that don't always work. When the story directly addresses the refugee crisis, and when this emergency begins to have an immediate impact on the family in question, that's when this book comes alive.
46 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Lost Children Archive.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

July 28, 2019 – Started Reading
July 28, 2019 – Shelved
August 5, 2019 – Shelved as: booker-nominee
August 5, 2019 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-21 of 21 (21 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Kasa Cotugno Looking forward to your take on this


Peter Boyle Kasa wrote: "Looking forward to your take on this"

50 pages in, Kasa - so far so good!


message 3: by CanadianReader (last edited Aug 05, 2019 09:49PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

CanadianReader This is a really good, thoughtful review, Peter. I understand your points and I concur with them. I started this novel, got a fair way in, and abandoned it, finding it flat and academic. (I didn’t make it to the turning point you mention.) In fact, if I’m not mistaken, the author has a Ph.D. in comparative literature or some such, and, boy, does it show. I could feel the to-me unpleasant threads of literary theory and postmodern thought woven in here. (I have a bit of personal experience with the stuff.) I really don’t like this kind of thing in a novel. I’ve thought that I should give this another chance. Your review has convinced me not to bother. 😊 Yes, it is a topical novel, but as far as I got, I found it lacking and show-offy.


Roman Clodia Spot on: important topics but over-constructed as a novel


TBV (on hiatus) A thoughtful and well argued review, Peter.


Peter Boyle Canadian wrote: "This is a really good, thoughtful review, Peter. I understand your points and I concur with them. I started this novel, got a fair way in, and abandoned it, finding it flat and academic. (I didn’t ..."

Thanks as always CR. I didn't know that the author has such a PhD but now it makes sense. It feels like she was trying to show off her (admittedly deep) literary knowledge but at the expense of a more compelling story. I don't believe that you missed out on huge amount by not finishing it, even though it definitely improves towards the end. But life is too short to stick with an unenjoyable book.
There was an interview with Luiselli in the Guardian last week where she mentioned that she was forced to read the Russian classics at age 10 - I guess that explains a lot! https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...


Peter Boyle Roman Clodia wrote: "Spot on: important topics but over-constructed as a novel"

We are on the same page RC - "self-consciously literary" as you say yourself, even though there aspects of the book that merit praise too.


message 8: by Peter (last edited Aug 06, 2019 10:56AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Peter Boyle TBV wrote: "A thoughtful and well argued review, Peter."

Thanks so much, TBV!


message 9: by CanadianReader (last edited Aug 05, 2019 10:08PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

CanadianReader Peter wrote: "Canadian wrote: "This is a really good, thoughtful review, Peter. I understand your points and I concur with them. I started this novel, got a fair way in, and abandoned it, finding it flat and aca..."
Yes, I saw that piece too, Peter. I think the short interview offers insight into this book. When reading, I sensed the author’s desire to impress with her seriousness and intellect. For me, it got in the way of the story. I wanted Luiselli to step aside and get off her high horse. I know lots of people loved this book. I went in wanting to, but I had a hard time with what you so aptly refer to as the “meandering”.


Peter Boyle Canadian wrote: "Peter wrote: "Canadian wrote: "This is a really good, thoughtful review, Peter. I understand your points and I concur with them. I started this novel, got a fair way in, and abandoned it, finding i..."

I totally agree. The book examines such a important issue, and the literary theatrics only serve to distract from it.


message 11: by Laura (new) - added it

Laura Nice review, similar points made by Canadian in her review - so - is there going to be anything left for the shortlist??


Peter Boyle Laura wrote: "Nice review, similar points made by Canadian in her review - so - is there going to be anything left for the shortlist??"

Good question Laura! I would give Night Boat to Tangier and Lanny a strong chance at making the shortlist. also, I'm reading Deborah Levy's book right now and I'm pretty impressed so far. And I guess the Atwood and the Rushdie are two big unknowns. Who do you think will make the final six?


message 13: by Laura (new) - added it

Laura Have you read Canadian's review of Lanny and Deborah Levy's one - I'm fully supportive of her views - we generally concur. Atwood will make the shortlist, probably Rushdie also because they're great writers. I'm trying to remember who trashed Nighboat - but the summary plot doesn't appeal to me anyway. My final shortlist only has 2 on it.!!


Peter Boyle Laura wrote: "Have you read Canadian's review of Lanny and Deborah Levy's one - I'm fully supportive of her views - we generally concur. Atwood will make the shortlist, probably Rushdie also because they're grea..."

Yes I have read Canadian's excellent reviews, though I liked Lanny a lot more myself. Night Boat is terrific imho (but maybe I'm biased because it's by an Irish writer). I reckon Atwood has a good shot - The Handmaid's Tale is such an iconic book that the sequel is highly anticipated. Rushdie has been a bit hit and miss in recent years, as far as I'm aware, but he's so high profile, he's always in with a good chance.


message 15: by Meike (last edited Aug 07, 2019 08:42AM) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Meike Great review as always, Peter! Showy, pretentious, over-constructed, and there might be a better novel buried under all of this - maybe. :-) The whole thing is particularly upsetting because the topic is so important, but Luiselli only illustrates the difference between well-intentioned and well executed.


Peter Boyle Meike wrote: "Great review as always, Peter! Showy, pretentious, over-constructed, and there might be a better novel buried under all of this - maybe. :-) The whole thing is particularly upsetting because the to..."

Thanks, Meike! I wanted to like it more than I did. The US immigration issue needs to be written about and the problems of the current system need to be highlighted. But I think a simpler approach would have served this story better - no need for over-construction as you say.


Paula K A thought provoking review, Peter! Interesting to read your pros and cons on this nominee...


Peter Boyle Paula wrote: "A thought provoking review, Peter! Interesting to read your pros and cons on this nominee..."

Thanks so much Paula, it's certainly a thought provoking book.


message 19: by Matt (new) - rated it 3 stars

Matt Quann Great review, Peter! It seems like we both liked similar parts of the novel and had trouble with others. Glad you could take something of value from it all.


Peter Boyle Matthew wrote: "Great review, Peter! It seems like we both liked similar parts of the novel and had trouble with others. Glad you could take something of value from it all."

Thanks Matthew! Bit of a mixed bag I agree but still glad I read it :-)


Paula Hagar "I do think there is the kernel of a great novel in there somewhere but it is buried beneath some showy literary affectations that don't always work." My sentiments exactly. Love your review.


back to top